Podcast episode
August 9, 2019
Episode 67: An Erudite Esotericist: Introducing Plutarch of Chæronea
Plutarch of Chæronea is one of the most widely-read authors of antiquity, and had an output to match, having written a large number of biographies and philosophical essays. But running through his work as a whole, an especially in a number of essays on esoteric subjects, is a Middle Platonist philosophic perennialism, accessed through esoteric hermeneutics of a broad ‘tradition’ including not only philosophy proper, but mysteries, initiations, oracles, and other forms of divination, all read as telling a single, Platonist truth.
We introduce the great man, give a survey of his life and works, and broach the subject of his esoteric world-view, preparing the way for more in-depth explorations of Plutarch’s properly esoteric works in coming episodes.
Works Cited in this Episode:
(Note: Plutarch’s works are conventionally cited by the Latin titles given them by Humanists; if the title is a personal name – e.g. ‘Numa’, ‘Julius Cæsar’ – the reference is to one of the Lives, while thematic titles like de defectu oraculorum, or ‘On how the Oracles Have Stopped Functioning’, refer to the Moralia. The works of Plutarch, like those of Plato, have ‘Stephanus numbers’, a standard way of referring to his text based on the critical edition of Stephanus (1572). Thus, de Is. 67-68.377f-378a would refer to ‘On Isis and Osiris Chapters 67-68, Stephanus numbers 377f-378a. As for the first Latin edition of Plutarch, it was edited by Niccolò Tomeo, a fascinating Renaissance esotericist about whom you can hear in this interview)
Primary:
- Apuleius Metamorphoses, the narrator Lucius is Plutarch’s relative: 1.2: ‘I went to Thessaly on business: for in that place the foundations of our origin on the maternal side were laid by the illustrious Plutarch, and afterwards by his nephew, Sextus, the philosopher, and thus became the source of renown to us.’ (trans. Thos. Taylor)
- Artemidorus: Plutarch’s death Oneirocritica 4.72.
- Plutarch: Calls himself an ‘academic’: see Charles Brittain. Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001, p. 223). He wrote a lost ‘On the Unity of Plato’s Academy’ or possibly ‘On the Unity of the Academy Since Plato’ – both readings of the title are possible. On the ubiquity of the true wisdom, de Is. 67-68.377f-378a. Inspired founders and nomothetes who hid wisdom within religious institutions to protect it from the masses: de E Delphico 9. 388f: κρυπτόμενοι δὲ τοὺς πολλοὺς οἱ σοφώτεροι κτλ. Refrains from telling intiatory secrets: e.g. ibid. 21.359c; 35364e. On Pythagorean secret wisdom (ἄρρητα) see Quaest. conv. 728 D 4-6; cf. Numa 22. On the ‘epoptic’ level of the philosophic curriculum: de Is. 77.382d-e. On the gods as esotericists: de Is. 369b-c; cf. De Pyth. orac. 407e where the philosophic secrets in oracles are hidden, not from the unlettered masses, but from tyrants, so as to protect humanity from the potential abuse of power such knowledge would give to tyrannical rulers. Plato expressed his doctrine of the evil world-soul both openly and esoterically: De Isid. 48.370e9-f5.
Secondary:
- Van Nuffelen, P., ‘Words of Truth: Mystical Silence as a Philosophical and Rhetorical Tool in Plutarch’, Hermathena (2007), pp. 9-39.
Recommended Reading:
- Dillon, J., The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism 80 BC to AD 220 (London: Duckworth, 1977). pp. 184-230.
- Dillon, J., ‘The Social Role of the Philosopher in the Second Century AD: Some Remarks’, in P.A. Stadter and L. van der Stockt, ed., Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals, and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002), pp. 29-40.
- Hirsh-Luipold, R., Plutarchs Denken in Bildern: Studien zur literarischen, philosophischen und religiösen Funktion des Bildhaften (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002).
- Russell, D.A., Plutarch (London: Duckworth, 1973).
Themes
Esoteric Hermeneutics, Evil Soul, Middle Platonism, Neopythagoreanism, Oracles, Philosophy, Plutarch, Rome
Ethan Dickey
October 5, 2019
I’m certainly jumping ahead a bit here, but what (doctrinally) distinguishes Middle Platonism from Neoplatonism?
Earl Fontainelle
October 5, 2019
Ethan,
There’s more to that question than meets the eye! Here’s the traditional academic story as I understand it, in oversimplified form: Middle Platonists believe in a supreme hypercosmic Nous or divine mind as a first principle of reality, or perhaps the first principle. Neoplatonists, on the other hand, maintain that there is a higher principle (usually the One, the Good, sometimes the Beautiful, and often all of these things together) which transcends the Nous, and also transcends every other possible attribute. This highest principle is thus often approached apophatically, i.e. you can’t actually say anything about it, because it transcends all language and categories of thought. Things thus get ‘mystical’.
So that’s the basic ‘doctrinal’ difference which tends to be emphasised. It’s nonsense, though, or at least not that clear-cut: Philo (whom we’ve met in the podcast) and Numenius (whom we shall meet soon) both maintain a fully transcendent first principle; Numenius’ lost ‘On the Good’, a text we shall be discussing, seems to be moving in a direction very typical of so-called Neoplatonism. So the old idea of a clear-cut doctrinal turn which occurs from Plotinus onward (third century) has been pretty much rubbished at this stage.
Another way of approaching the question is by using these categories for what they are: really just vague periodisations invented by scholars. Thus Middle Platonism is basically any dogmatic teaching based on Plato from more-or-less the later Hellenistic (Antiochus of Ascalon being a key figure here) to Plotinus. Plotinus and everyone after him is a Neoplatonist. That is, in practice, what people tend to mean when they use these categories.
The podcast’s official preference is for ‘Late Platonism’ rather than ‘Neoplatonism’, since it is a less value-laden term. But we mean the same thing: Plotinus and everyone after him until philosophic Platonism as such dies out in the Roman realm (temporarily!).
I hope that’s helpful.
Mathias Warnes
September 11, 2021
This maybe my favorite episode yet!