Members-only podcast episode
Storytime: Reading Eunapius of Sardis’ Lives of Philosophers and Sophists
This is a special podcast episode for SHWEP members only
Already a member? Log in here to view this episode
We explore some of the amazing (indeed, miraculous) oral histories of Iamblichus, of Iamblichean philosophy, and of Iamblichus’ successors retold by Eunapius of Sardis in his Lives of Philosophers and Sophists. Included are Plotinus and Porphyry, a major section on Iamblichus, and the lives and exploits of Iamblichus’ students Ædesius of Cappadocia, Sopater of Syria, Eustathius of Cappadocia, and Eustathius’ wife Sosipatra, a female holy-woman of the first water who quite overshadows her husband,
Schools and lineages are formed and compete for students and prestige (or for knowledge of the eternal truth), we discuss our first major female philosopher, and the foundations of reality crumble as the encroachments of imperial Christianity rock the polytheist world.
Works Cited in this Episode:
- Asclepius: the ‘apocalypse of Egypt’, foretelling the downfall of Egyptian religion at the hands of unclean foreigners, and concomitant destruction of the universal order: 24-26 Nock/Festugière.
- Iamblichus: Porphyry changed his mind about stuff: De anima 6 Dillon/Finamore: are the souls present in the noetic world? ‘… as for Porphyry, he is in two minds on the subject, now dissociating himself violently from this view, now adopting it as the doctrine handed down from above.’
- Plato’s Timæus on the ‘home star’ of each soul, which will be the soul’s destination upon death: 42b4.
- Porphyry on his suicidal period: Plot. 11.
- J. Bidez. Vie de Porphyre. Teubner, 1913.
- Aaron P. Johnson. Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: The Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity. The University Press, Cambridge, 2013.
- Wilmer Cave Wright. Philostratus and Eunapius: The Lives of the Sophists. William Heinemann/Putnam, London/New York, NY, 1922. Listeners might be interested in a new book specifically about Wright (we have not read it, and so cannot recommend it or otherwise): David Neal Greenwood. Steely-Eyed Athena: Wilmer Cave Wright and the Advent of Female Classicists. Cambridge Philological Society, 2022.
- Nicholas Banner. Philosophic Silence and the ’One’ in Plotinus. The University Press, Cambridge, 2018.
- P. Brown. The World of Late Antiquity. Thames and Hudson, London, 1971, pp. 96-103.
- Patricia Cox. Biography in Late Antiquity: A Quest for the Holy Man. University of California Press, London/Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA, 1983.
- G. Fowden. The Pagan Holy Man In Late Antique Society. JHS, 102:33–59, 1982.
- Idem. From Empire to Commonwealth: The Consequences of Monotheism in Late Antiquity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993.
- Edward J. Watts. City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA/London, 2006.
April 10, 2022
Older translation online
April 10, 2022
I also became interested after reading
“Listeners might be interested in a new book specifically about Wright (we have not read it, and so cannot recommend it or otherwise): David Neal Greenwood. Steely-Eyed Athena: Wilmer Cave Wright and the Advent of Female Classicists. Cambridge Philological Society, 2022.”
Haven’t read Greenwood’s book but I did look up Wright. She (yes…she) seems to have been a remarkable person
April 10, 2022
If you want to see Wilmer Cave Wright’s introduction
April 11, 2022
The recent episodes have helped me to see Sophists in a new way; I used to think they were showmen and charlatans.
Last time just to get a general review I looked up Arthur Holmes
Holmes himself had a pretty conventional view, but he assigned readings from Kaufmann, who had a very different view (quoted from his Philophic Classics, Vol 1, page 52)
“The Sophists are the great representatives of the Greek enlightenment. They come after the bold speculators and metaphysicians and ask what we can really know. Their thought is critical, not constructive; and their criticisms do not stop before all kinds of prejudices and traditions. Some of them question the hallowed distinction between Greeks and barbarians and that between masters and slaves: is not the supposition that barbarians and slaves are more similar to the animals than to the Greeks based on convention rather than on evidence? They do not only question prejudices of this sort which Plato and Aristotle sought to revive but all knowledge and all ethics”